Talk:10 Hygiea/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
There appears to be a lot of [citation needed] templates throughout the article. In this case, this would not comply the good article criteria of having a large number of such tags. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nrco0e (talk • contribs) 02:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Nrco0e, anyone who opens a GA reassessment is responsible for notifying the significant contributors to the article and the relevant WikiProjects, and the reassessment should not be closed until they have had a chance to respond, typically at least seven days. See the WP:GAR page, step 5 under Individual Reassessment, for further information on how to do so including a useful template with a standardized notification message (the same is done for community reassessments). Remember, the hope in a GAR is that the article is brought back up to GA level, so people need to know that a review is being done to find the ways in which it falls short. Also, as you have opened this as an individual reassessment rather than a community reassessment, you've taken the role of doing a complete review, and closing it when either it is restored to GA level or has not been sufficiently improved. If you're not prepared to do that, then this should be a community reassessment. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided to close this review as the number of citation needed tags have been reduced. The article shall remain listed as a good article. Nrco0e (talk) 03:27, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]